🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to craft a tailor-made persona of the president. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a invented security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The presidency was in essence a selection process with many contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state de facto.

• The shortlist included various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched his rise, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “spy” may in part have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. His harder version led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. His influence is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it might seek to question.